Mitte Realty

Your Realty Developer

Court Proceedings

by Brianna - February 16th, 2014.
Filed under: News. Tagged as: , .

Correct point and in what context you are a member of the parties, and as a personal attitude to the parties. It is undesirable to answer that will take place from one of the parties in hostile or hostile relations, because it would undermine the credibility of your further readings. To answer questions of the court, the parties or the prosecutor as possible briefly. The witness asks questions first and foremost, as a rule, the judge.

Questions or any actors you may not ask – you came to questioning you – with the exception of requests to clarify their question (if he was not heard). The witness has no right to ask any questions at all to anyone. Three of the trial of A. First, let’s call it preparation, include: the announcement by the judge in its own name and behalf of the secretary of the meeting, check documents which were the participants in the process, the consideration of the possibility of a case due to the absence of any person, the declaration by the court to the meeting of their rights. This part ends with a question about the judge’s is whether the parties have any requests and appeals. As a general rule, you must answer no, because all the explanation you can give in the future.

The second part of the meeting is the consideration of the merits. Here, the court listens to the explanation of plaintiff, defendant and third parties, if any, involved in the case. In such an explanation is necessary on the merits and detailed explanation of what you’re asking the defendant, and why, and if you are the defendant – for what because of objections to the claim. The court usually asks clarifying questions. At this stage the invite and question witnesses, but also asks the court to attach to the case a copy of your existing documents, give explanations about the documents submitted by the other party and ask, if necessary, appoint a review. It should be noted that, before witnesses can be interviewed, you must file a petition about this in explanation of the need their interrogation and the court must agree with you and make an oral ruling on interrogation. This part of the meeting is the main and decisive. It ends with a brief announcement of the court available in the documents and issue court that you could explain further, and the court about whether you have other evidence. B. The third part of the meeting – the judicial debate. They consist of speeches of persons involved in the case and their lawyers. In a speech to again outline your position, refer to the documents in support thereof, the testimony of witnesses and on that basis to ask the court to deny a claim or suit. After the presentations, the law allows a replica of the parties. Distributed free provided the author and proper attribution.

Comments are closed.